Agrarian Twilight in Rural West Java: from Accumulation to Exclusion

  • Ahmad Choibar Tridakusumah S3 Sosiologi Pedesaan Angkatan 2014
  • Endriatmo Soetarto
  • Soeryo Adiwibowo
  • Ekawati Sri Wahyuni
Keywords: accumulation, agrarian twilight, agrarian relation, dispossession, exclusion


Through this research, the phenomenon of agrarian twilight in rural West java was analyzed by the interactions of agrarian relations, the exclusion process, and actors that involved due to the agrarian history. With the implementation of a critical paradigm by multi method of qualitative research (historical sociology and sociological history) and case study approach, this research releases a deep study of space, temporality and contention so that it can reveal a fundamental problems inequality of agrarian structures in rural West Java from the era colonial up to the present situation. This research was conducted for six months starting from May to October 2018, primary data were collected by in-depth interviews with peasants as key informants of this research and supported by various secondary research data and other relevant documents. The data thereafter analyzed by means of three phases, as interpretative, empirical, and dialectical technique. The results showed that the erosion of the agricultural sector by the industrial and service sectors were complemented by the shrinking of agriculture land due to the conversion of agriculture land to non-agriculture. Historically, agrarian twilight was an alteration from the land accumulation by corporations that further lead to the exclusion of peasants from their land, with the period of time from colonial to the present situation. Unequal access to land, increasing land markets, power, and capital were the triggered. This situations conduced that peasants who directly faced changes in rural agrarian structure were cornered to the most vulnerable position. This condition shows the description of agrarian twilight in rural West Java.

Author Biographies

Ahmad Choibar Tridakusumah, S3 Sosiologi Pedesaan Angkatan 2014
Program Studi Agribisnis Fakultas Pertanian UNPAD
Endriatmo Soetarto
Dosen Fakultas Ekologi Manusia IPB
Soeryo Adiwibowo
Dosen Fakultas Ekologi Manusia IPB
Ekawati Sri Wahyuni
Dosen Fakultas Ekologi Manusia IPB


Bernstein, H. 2010. Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change. Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing.

BPN. 2016. Inventarisasi Data HGU. Kantor Wilayah Badan Pertanahan Nasional Jawa Barat.

BPS Provinsi Jawa Barat. 2017. Jawa Barat Dalam Angka 2017. Bandung. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Barat.

Brabazon, H dan Webber, J. 2014. Evo Morales and The MST In Bolivia: Continuities and Discontinuities in Agrarian Reform. Journal of Agrarian Change,Vol.14/3, pp.435–465.

Edelman, M dan Wolford, W. 2017. Introduction: Critical Agrarian Studies in Theory and Practice, Symposium: Agrarianism in Theory and Practice. Antipode, Vol. 00/0, pp.1–18.

Caceres, D. 2015. Accumulation by Dispossession and Socio-Environmental Conflicts Caused by The Expansion of Agribusiness in Argentina. Journal of Agrarian Change,Vol.15/1, pp. 116-147.

Comstock, D. 1982. Power in Organizations: Toward a Critical Theory. The Pacific Sociological Review,Vol 25/2, pp.139-162.

Das, R. 2001. Class, Capitalism and Agrarian Transition: A Critical Review of Some Recent Arguments. The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 29, pp 155–174.

_____ 2017. David Harvey’s Theory of Accumulation by Dispossession: A Marxist Critique. World Review of Political Economy.Vol 8/4,pp: 590-616.

de Angelis, M. 2001. Marx and Primitive Accumulation: The Continuous Character of Capital’s ‘‘Enclosures’’. The Commoner, Vol. 2, pp. 1–22.

Erlina. 2017. Kebijakan Reformasi Agraria pada Masa Pemerintahan Joko Widodo Ditinjau dari Kajian HAM dan Gender. Riau Law Journal, Vol. 1/2, pp. 253-272.

Gilbert, D dan Afrizal. 2018. The Land Exclusion Dilemma and Sumatra’s Agrarian Reactionaries. The Journal of Peasant Studies, DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2017. 1404990.

Goodwin, J. 1991. Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 40/1, pp. 217-220.

Glassman, J. 2006. Primitive Accumulation, Accumulation by Dispossession, Accumulation by ‘‘Extraeconomic’’ Means. Progress in Human Geography, Vol 30, pp. 608–625.

Hall, D. Hirsch, P. dan Li, M. 2011. Powers of Exclusion: Land Dillemas in Southeast Asia. Ottawa: NUS Press.

Hart, G. 2006. Denaturalizing Dispossession: Critical Ethnography in the Age of Resurgent Imperialism. Antipode, Vol. 38, pp. 977–1004.

Harvey, D. 2004. The New Imperialism. London. Oxford University Press.

Heckmann, L. Y. 2010. The Return of Private Property: Rural Life After Agrarian Reform in The Republic of Azerbaijan. Berlin. Berlin Lit Verlag.

Hirsch, P. 2016. Afterword: Land Transformations and Exclusion Across Regions dalam McDonnell S et al. Kastom, property and ideology: land transformation in Melanesia. Canberra. ANU Press.

Ileto, R. 2002. On Sidel's Response and Bossism in The Philippines. Philippine Political Science Journal, Vol 23/46, pp. 151-174.

Ince, O. 2017. Between Equal Rights: Primitive Accumulation and Capital’s Violence. Political Theory, Vol I/30.

KPA. 2017. Catatan Akhir Tahun Konsorsium Pembaruan Agraria, Reforma agraria di bawah bayangan investasi gaung besar di pinggir jalan. Jakarta. Konsorsium Pembaruan Agraria.

Krishna, A. 2002. Active Social Capital:Tracing the Roots of Development and Democracy. NewYork: Columbia University Press.

Lambach, D. 2004. State in Society: Joe Migdal and the Limits of State Authority. Conference “Political Concepts Beyond the Nation State: Cosmopolitanism, territoriality, democracy”, Danish Political Theory Network Conference, University of Copenhagen, Department of Political Science Copenhagen, pp. 27-30.

Landsdrukkerij. 1915. Cultuur adres-boek Lijst Van. Batavia.

Levien, M. 2013. The Agrarian Question in The Neoliberal Era: Primitive Accumulation and The Peasantry.The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol 40/1, pp. 307-311.

Luthfi, A.N dan Fauzi, R. M. 2010. Kronik Agraria Indonesia Memperluas Imajinasi Lintas Zaman, Sektor dan Aktor. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.

Migdal, J. S. 1988. Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in The Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Mishra, D. K. 2011. Behind Dispossession: State, Land Grabbing and Agrarian Change in Rural Orissa. International conference on global land grabbing. LDPI.

Moidady, N. Soetarto, E dan Agusta, I. 2017. Eksploitasi Tenaga Kerja Cadangan pada Kapitalisme Pedalaman: Studi Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit di Kecamatan Bualemo Kabupaten Banggai Sulawesi Tengah. Jurnal Sodality Vol.5/3, pp.184-190.

Moyo, S. Jha, P. dan Yeros, P. 2013. The Classical Agrarian Question: Myth, Reality and Relevance Today. Agrarian South.Journal of Political Economy, Vol 2/93.

Patnaik, U. 1990. Agrarian relations and accumulation the mode of production debate in India. London: Oxford University Press. US.

Pattenden, J. 2011. Gatekeeping as Accumulation and Domination: Decentralization and Class Relations in Rural South India. Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol 11/2, pp. 164–194.

PPC. 2016. Data penggarap lahan negara eks HGU di Kadupandak. Cianjur: Paguyuban Petani Cianjur (PPC).

Priatna, R. et al. 2016. Perubahan kelembagaan dalam pengelolaan sumberdaya laut tradisional (kasus kelembagaan Sasi di Kaimana). Jurnal Sodality,Vol. 4/3, pp. 257-264.

Samaddar, R. 2008. Primitive Accumulation and Some Aspect of Work and Life in India in The Early Part of The Twenty First Century. Kalkutta: Mahanirban Calcutta Research Group.

Sihaloho, M. et al. 2016. Perubahan struktur agraria, kemiskinan dan gerak penduduk: sebuah tinjauan historis. Jurnal Sodality, Vol. 4/1, pp.: 48-60.

Sidel, J. T. 1997. Philippine Politics in Town, District, and Province: Bossism in Cavite and Cebu. The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 56/4, pp.947-966.

Soetarto, E. 2009. Reforma Agraria Membutuhkan Pengumpulan Data yang lengkap dalam Shohibudin M, editor. Ranah Studi Agraria Penguasaan Tanah dan Hubungan Agraris. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.

Sikor, T dan Thanh, T. 2007. Exclusive Versus Inclusive Devolution in Forest Management: Insights from Forest land Allocation in Vietnam’s Central Highlands. Land Use Policy, Vol 24, pp 644–653.

Stoll, S. 2017. Ramp Hollow:The Ordeal of Appalachia.New York: Hill and Wang.

Sutirman, A. 2014. Perkebunan Jawa Barat dari Masa ke Masa.[Dinas Perkebunan Provinsi Jawa Barat] [31 januari 2019]. Diunduh dari: http://disbun.jabarprov.

Swanson, D. 2018. Review Ramp Hollow: The Ordeal of Appalachia. Journal of Southern History, Vol. 84/4, pp. 960-962.

Taylor, M. 2012. The Antinomies of Financial Inclusion: Debt, Distress and The Workings of Indian Microfinance. Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol. 12/4, pp. 601–610.

Webber, M. 2008. Primitive Accumulation in Modern China.London: Dialectica Anthropology.

Wiradi, G. 2009. Reforma Agraria Perjalanan yang Belum Berakhir. Bandung: AKATIGA.