Pengaruh Perbedaan Jenis Kedelai terhadap Kualitas Mutu Tahu

  • Nuri Andarwulan 1) South East Asian Food and Agricultural Science and Technology Center, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor dan 2) Departemen Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan, Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor
  • Lilis Nuraida 1) South East Asian Food and Agricultural Science and Technology Center, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor dan 2) Departemen Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan, Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor
  • Dede R. Adawiyah 1) South East Asian Food and Agricultural Science and Technology Center, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor dan 2) Departemen Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan, Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor
  • Ria Noviar Triana South East Asian Food and Agricultural Science and Technology Center, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor
  • Denny Agustin South East Asian Food and Agricultural Science and Technology Center, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor
  • Desty Gitapratiwi South East Asian Food and Agricultural Science and Technology Center, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor
Keywords: soybean, texture, tofu, quality

Abstract

Tofu is a processed product which is produced by coagulation process of soybean protein extract. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the relation of soybean variety to physicochemical characteristics during processing and the charactiristics of tofu. The soybean (IP new, IP 1 year old, US, Argentina, Indonesia) had moisture content (8.67-9.95%), ash content (5.15-5.36%), protein content (30.33-36.49%),  fat content (15.91-25.11%) and carbohydrate (26.98-35.00%). The highest yield of tofu was found in soybean IP New that was 195.60%, with tofu water content (80.18-83.17%), protein content (8.83-10.69%), and fat content (3.94-6.31%). The highest total solid was found in tofu from Argentina soybean that was 19.82%, while the density of tofu relatively similar (1%) to other tofu. The highest protein recovery and total solid recovery were found in tofu from Argentina soybean (62.05% and 39.62%). Argentina soybean was the best soybean which can be used to produce tofu. That soybean had the best protein recovery and based on texture quality analysis the soybean had similar characteristics with IP New soybean which had the best hardness, elasticity, and cohesiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[AOAC] Association of Official Analytical Chemist. 1998. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC Inter-national. 16th Edition -4th Revision. Methods 925.10, 920.87, 920.85, 923.03. Gaithersburg, Maryland (US): AOAC International.

Berk Z. 1992.Technology of Production of Edible Flours and Protein Products From Soybeans: Soybean and Related Products. FAO Agriculture Service Bulle-tin. 97: Chap 8. ISBN : 92-5-103118-5.

[BSN] Badan Standar Nasional Indonesia.1998. Tahu. Dewan Standarisasi Nasional.

Cai TD, Chang KC, Shih MC, Houa HJ, Jia M. 1997. Comparison of bench and production scale methods for making soymilk and tofu from 13 soybean varie-ties. Food Res Int 30(9): 659-668.

Gandhi AP. 2009. Review article: Quality of soybean and its food products. Int Food Res J 16: 11-19.

Kao FJ, Su NW, Lee MH. 2003. Effect of calcium sul-fate concentration in soymilk on the microstructure of firm tofu and teh protein constitutions in tofu whey. J Agric Food Chem 51(21): 6211-6216.

Khatib KA, Aramouni FM, Herald TJ, Boyer JE. 2002. Physicochemical characteristics of soft tofu formu-lated from selected soybean varieties. J Food Quality 25: 289-303.

Kim Y, Wicker L. 2005. Soybean cultivars impact quality and function of soymilk and tofu. J Science Food Agric 85(15): 2514-2518.

Ma L, Li B, Han F, Yan S, Wang L, Sun J. 2015. Eva-luation of the chemical quality traits of soybean seeds, as related to sensory attributes of soymilk. Food Chem 173: 694-701.

Min S, Yu Y, Martin SS. 2005. Effect of soybean varie-ties and growing locations on the physical and che-mical properties of soymilk and tofu. J Food Sci 70(1): C8-C12.

Min S, Yu Y, Martin ST. 2005. Locations on the phy-sical and chemical properties of soymilk and tofu. Food Chemistry Toxicol 1(70): C8-C12.

Muchtadi D. 2010. Kedelai Komponen untuk Kesehatan. Alfabeta, Bandung.

Mujo R, Trinth DT, Ng PKW. 2003. Characterization of storage proteins in different soybean varieties and their relationship to tofu yield and texture. Food Chem 82: 265-273.

Obatulo VA. 2008. Effect of different coagulants on yield and quality of tofu from soymilk. European Food Research Technol 226: 467-472.

Poysa V, Woodrow L. 2002. Stability of soybean seed composition and its effect on soymilk and tofu yield and quality. Food Research Int 35: 337-345.

Rekha CR, Vijayalakshmi G. 2013. Influence of pro-cessing parameters on quality of soycurd (tofu). J Food Science Technol 50(1): 176-180.

Syah D, Sitanggang AB, Faradilla RHF, Trisna V, Kar-sono Y, Septianita DA. 2015. The influence of coa-gulation conditions and storage proteins on the textural properties of soy curd. CyTA-J Food 13(2): 259-263.

Vishwanathan KH, Singh V, Subramanian R. 2011. Wet grinding characteristics of soybean for soymilk extraction. J Food Eng 106: 28-34.

Published
2018-10-31
How to Cite
Andarwulan, N., Nuraida, L., Adawiyah, D. R., Triana, R. N., Agustin, D., & Gitapratiwi, D. (2018). Pengaruh Perbedaan Jenis Kedelai terhadap Kualitas Mutu Tahu. Jurnal Mutu Pangan : Indonesian Journal of Food Quality, 5(2), 66-72. Retrieved from https://dthh.journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jmpi/article/view/26224
Section
Articles