Family Capitals, Livelihood Strategies, and Family Well-Being of Plantation Worker

  • Nurul Salimah Undergraduate Student at Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology, Bogor Agricultural University
  • Istiqlaliyah Muflikhati Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, Faculty of Human Ecology, Bogor Agricultural University

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the influence of family characteristic, family capitals, and livelihood strategy toward family well-being. The sample of this study was family with wife who worked as a tea picker in Purwabakti, Pamijahan, Bogor. There were 100 families chosen randomly in this research. Family well-being was observed based on indicators defined by National Population and Family Planning Board (NPFPB) and Statistics Indonesia (SI). The analyses used in this research were descriptive analyses, independent sample T-test, and logistic regression. The result showed husband age and family size negatively affected the family well-being. Physical capital and financial capitals positively affected the family well-being. Meanwhile, livelihood strategy did not significantly affect the family well-being.

Keywords: family capitals, family well-being, livelihood strategies

 

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh karakteristik keluarga, kepemilikan modal keluarga, dan strategi nafkah terhadap kesejahteraan keluarga. Contoh dalam penelitian ini adalah keluarga dengan istri yang bekerja sebagai buruh pemetik teh di Desa Purwabakti, Kecamatan Pamijahan, Kabupaten Bogor. Contoh dalam penelitian ini sebanyak 100 orang yang dipilih secara acak. Kesejahteraan keluarga diukur dengan menggunakan indikator BKKBN dan BPS. Analisis yang digunakan merupakan analisis deskriptif, uji beda independent sample T-test dan uji regresi logistik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan umur suami dan besar keluarga berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap kesejahteraan keluarga. Modal fisik dan modal finansial berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap kesejahteraan keluarga. Sementara itu, strategi nafkah tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kesejahteraan keluarga.

Kata kunci : kesejahteraan keluarga, modal keluarga, strategi nafkah

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfiasari. (2013). Analisis modal sosial dalam pemberdayaan ekonomi keluarga miskin di Kelurahan Kedung Jaya, Kecamatan Tanah Sereal, Kota Bogor. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen. 1 (1). Retrived from http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/5753.

Barrett, C. B., Reardon, T., & Webb, P. (2001). Non-farm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural africa: concepts, dynamics, and policy implications. Journal Food Policy. 26, 315-331. doi: 10.1016/S0306-9192(01)00014-8.

Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1991). Sustainable Rural Livelihood: Practical Concepts for 21st Century, IDS Discussion Paper 296 : IDS. Institute for Development Studies: Brighton.

Dharmawan, A. H. (2001). Farm Household Livelihood Strategies and Socio Economic Changes in Rural Indonesia. Retrived from http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/27926.

Dharmawan, A. H. (2006). Sistem Penghidupan dan Nafkah Pedesaaan Pandangan Sosiologi Nafkah (Livelihood Sociology) Mazhab Barat dan Mazhab Bogor. Sodality: Jurnal Trandisiplin Sosiologi, Komunikasi, dan Ekologi Manusia. 1 (2). Retrived from http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/sodality/article/view/5932.

Elmanora, Muflikhati, I., & Alfiasari. (2012). Kesejahteraan keluarga petani kayu manis. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen. 5(1). Retrived from http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jikk/article/view/6338.

Ellis, F. (1998). Household Strategies and Rural Livelihood Diversification. The Journal of Development Studies. 35 (1), 1-38.

Ellis, F., Kutengule, M., & Nyasulu, A. (2003). Livelihood and Rural Poverty Reductionin Malawi, “World Development”. 31 (19), 1495-1510. Retrived from http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/PDF/Outputs/Livelihoodsresearch/Ladder-wp17.pdf.

Eneyew, A., & Bekele, W. (2012). Livelihood Strategies and its determinants in Southern Ethiophia The Case of Boloso Sore of Wolaita zone. Journal of Social Science. Ethiopia University.

Fatwa, N. (2014). Kepadatan, kesesakan, privasi dan kesejahteran subjektif keluarga di pemukiman marginal Kota Bogor (Undergraduate thesis). Retrived from http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/71945.

Firdaus. (2008). Hubungan antara tekanan ekonomi, manajemen keuangan, danmekanisme koping, dengan kesejahteraan wanita pemetik teh (Undergraduate thesis). Retrived from http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/1879.

Grootaert, C. (1999). Social capital, household welfare and poverty in Indonesia. doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-2148.

Iskandar, A. (2007). Analisis praktek manajemen sumberdaya keluarga dan dampaknya terhadap kesejahteraan keluarga di Kabupaten dan Kota Bogor. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen. 2(1), 81-98. Retrived from http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/sodality/article/view/5890.

Masithoh, A. D. (2005). Analisis strategi nafkah rumah tangga petani perkebunan rakyat (Unpublished undergraduate thesis). Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor.

Muflikhati, I., Hartoyo, Sumarwan, U., Fahrudin, A., & Puspitawati, H. (2010). Kondisi sosial ekonoi dan tingkat kesejahteraan keluarga: kasus di wilayah pesisir Jawa Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen. 3(1), 1-10.

Nadiya, A. (2013). Hubungan antara kesejahteraan keluarga dengan kesejahteraan anak pada keluarga petani (Undergraduate thesis). Retrived from http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/67379.

National Population and Family Planning Board. (2005). Profil Hasil Pendataan Keluarga. Jakarta, Indonesia: Author.

Pramudita, N. O. (2014). Strategi nafkah dan tingkat kesejahteraan pada keluarga miskin (Undergraduate thesis). Retrived from http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/72049.

Puspitawati, H. (2012). Gender dan Keluarga: Konsep dan Realita di Indonesia. Bogor, Indonesia: IPB Press.

Saragih, S., Lassa, J., & Ramli, A. (2007). Kerangka penghidupan berkelanjutan. Retrived from www.zef.de/...er/media/2390_SL-Chapter1.pdf.

Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihood: A Frameworkfor Analysis, IDS Working Paper. (72).

Statistics Indonesia. (2011). Jumlah dan Persentase Penduduk Miskin dan Garis Kemiskinan Menurut Kabupaten/Kota Tahun 2011. Retrived from jabar.bps.go.id/subyek/jumlah-dan-persentase-penduduk-miskin-dan-garis-kemiskinan-menurut-kabupaten/kota-tahun-2011.

Statistics Indonesia. (2013). Jawa Barat dalam Angka. Jakarta, Indonesia: Author.

Sunarti, E. (2008). A study of plantation women workers; socio economic status, family strength, food consumption, children growth and development. Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor.

Sunarti, E. (2012). Tekanan ekonomi dan kesejahteraan objektif keluarga di perdesaan dan perkotaan. Retrived from http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/72280.

Widiyanto, Suwarto, & Setyowati, R. (2010). Dinamika nafkah keluarga petani pedesaan dengan pendekatan sustainable livelihood approach (SLA). Jurnal Agritext. (28), 80-88. Retrived from http://eprints.uns.ac.id/11094/1/Publikasi_Jurnal_%2820%29.pdf.

Widodo, S. (2011). Strategi nafkah berkelanjutan bagi keluarga miskin di daerah pesisir. Makara, Sosial Humaniora. 15(1).

Yadollahi, M., Paim, L., Othman, M., & Suandi, T. (2009). Factors affecting family status. European Journal of Scientific Research. 37(1), 94-109.

Published
2016-07-01
How to Cite
Salimah, N., & Muflikhati, I. (2016). Family Capitals, Livelihood Strategies, and Family Well-Being of Plantation Worker. Journal of Family Sciences, 1(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.29244/jfs.1.1.13-23