Relationship of Udder Morphometric Traits to Mothering Ability of Landrace X Large White Primiparous Sows

  • J. M. Dominguez Institute of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Banos
  • J. E. S. Manzanero Institute of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Banos
  • C. A. Lontoc-Junsay Institute of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Banos
  • P. P. Sangel Institute of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Food Science, University of the Philippines Los Banos
Keywords: Physical selection, replacement gilts, udder morphometry, mothering ability

Abstract

The use of udder morphometry is often neglected during the selection of replacement gilts. This study was aimed to characterize the udder morphometry of primiparous Landrace x Large White sows across different production stages; and to show its relationship to some mothering ability traits. A total of 20 primiparous Landrace x Large White sows were bred. For each sow, the udder morphometry was characterized by measuring traits like teat tip diameter (DIA), teat length (LEN), inter-teat distance on the same row (SAMER), adjacent teat base distance on opposite row (OPPR), and teat tip to floor distance (FLO) during pre-breeding, post-breeding, and post-farrowing stages. A comparison of observed traits was also made between left and right udders as well as between anterior and posterior udders. Furthermore, the relationship between mothering ability and udder morphometry was evaluated using correlation and regression analyses. Across stages, udder traits were symmetric; however, higher values were measured for traits in posterior than in anterior udders. In the pre-breeding stage, OPPR and FLO of the anterior part had moderate negative correlations to average weaning weight (AWWt) and average daily gain (ADG). On the other hand, in the post-breeding stage, OPPR of the posterior part had a moderate positive correlation to litter size born alive (LSBA) but had a moderate negative correlation to average birth weight (ABWt). Furthermore, IgG content in the colostrum had a strong positive correlation to SAMER of the anterior part but had a strong negative correlation to FLO of the anterior part. It can be concluded that the pre-breeding combined with post-breeding udder morphometry measurements in gilts is useful as a predictor of sow mothering ability. These traits can be included in the criteria when selecting replacement gilts to enhance the productivity of sow herd.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balzani, A., H. Cordell, & S. Edwards. 2015. Development of a methodology to describe udder conformation in sows. Animal 10: 432-439. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115002347

Balzani, A., H. Cordell, & S. Edwards. 2016a. Relationship of sow udder morphology with piglet suckling behavior and teat access. Theriogenology 86: 1913-1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.06.007

Balzani, A., H. Cordell, & S. Edwards. 2016b. Heritability of udder morphology and colostrum quality traits in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 94: 3636-3644. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0458

Balzani, A., H. Cordell, E. Sutcliffe, & S. Edwards. 2016c. Sources of variation in udder morphology of sows. J. Anim. Sci. 94: 394-400. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9451

Chalkias H., L. Rhydhmer, & N. Lundeheim. 2013. Genetic analysis of functional and non-functional teats in a population of Yorkshire pigs. Livest. Sci. 152: 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.01.003

Farmer, C., E. Fortin, & S. M├ęthot. 2017. In vivo measures of mammary development in gestating gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 95: 5358-5364. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2017.1768

Fraser, D. & J. Rushen. 1992. Colostrum intake by newborn piglets. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 72: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas92-001

Huntley, S.J., S. Cooper, A.J. Bradley, & L.E. Green. 2012. A cohort study of the associations between udder conformation, milk somatic cell count, and lamb weight in suckler ewes. J. Dairy Sci. 95: 5001-5010. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5369

Kim S.W., W.L. Hurley, I.K. Hant, & R.A. Easter. 2000. Growth of nursing pigs related to the characteristics of nursed mammary glands. J. Anim. Sci. 78:1313-1318. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7851313x

Klobasa F., E. Werhahn, & J.E. Butler. 1987. Composition of sow milk during lactation. J. Anim. Sci. 64: 8-10. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.6451458x

Koketsu Y., S. Tani, & R. Iida. 2017. Factors for improving reproductive performance of sows and herd productivity in commercial breeding herds. Porc. Health Manag. 3, 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-016-0049-7

Kouri, F., S. Charallah, A. Kouri, Z. Amirat, & F. Khammar. 2018. Milk production and its relationship with composition, body and udder morphological traits in Bedouin goat reared under arid conditions. Acta Sci. Anim. Sci. 41. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.42552

Norsvin. 2014. The annual report from the Norwegian Swine Breeding Organization: http://www.norsvin.lt/Genetic-Program/Breeding-Goals.

Ocepek, M., I. Andersen-Ranberg, S.A. Edwards, & I.L. Andersen. 2016. Udder characteristics of importance for teat use in purebred and crossbred pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 94:780-788. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9420

Ogawa, S., T. Tsukahara, R. Nishibayashi, M. Nakatani, M. Okutani, N. Nakanishi, K. Ushida, & R. Inoue. 2014. Shotgun proteomic analysis of porcine colostrum and mature milk. Anim. Sci. J. 85: 440-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12165

Olesen, I., A.F. Groen, & B. Gjerde. 2000. Definition of animal breeding goals for sustainable production systems. J. Anim. Sci. 78: 570-582.

Patterson, J. & G. Foxcroft. 2019. Gilt management for fertility and longevity. Animals, 9:434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070434

PHILSAN. 2010. Feed Reference Standards. 4th Edition. Philippine Society of Animal Nutritionists.

Propper, A.Y., B.A. Howard, & J.M. Veltmaat. 2016. Prenatal morphogenesis of mammary glands in mouse and rabbit. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 18: 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-013-9298-0

Rydhmer, L. 2000. Genetics of sow reproduction, including puberty, oestrus, pregnancy, farrowing and lactation. Livest. Prod.Sci. 66: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00170-0

SAS. 2016. SAS University Edition. SAS Institute, Cary NC.

Vasdal, G. & I.L. Andersen. 2012. A note on teat accessibility and sow parity - consequences for newborn piglets. Livest. Sci. 146: 91-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.02.005

Wu, W.Z., X.Q. Wang, G.Y. Wu, S.W. Kim, F. Chen, & J.J. Wang. 2010. Differential composition of proteomes in sow colostrum and milk from anterior and posterior mammary glands. J. Anim. Sci. 88: 2657-2664. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-2972

Zwertvaegher, I., J. Baert, J. Vangeyte, A. Genbrugge, & S. Van Weyenberg. 2011. Objective measuring technique for teat dimensions of dairy cows. Biosyst. Eng., 110: 206-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.08.009

Published
2020-02-26
How to Cite
Dominguez, J. M., Manzanero, J. E. S., Lontoc-Junsay, C. A., & Sangel, P. P. (2020). Relationship of Udder Morphometric Traits to Mothering Ability of Landrace X Large White Primiparous Sows. Tropical Animal Science Journal, 43(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.5398/tasj.2020.43.1.11